The auditor evaluates an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period not less than one year following the date of the financial statements being audited (a longer period may be considered if the auditor believes such extended period to be relevant). If so, the auditor must draw attention to the uncertainty regarding the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, in their auditor’s report. Separate standards and guidance have been issued by the Auditing Practices Board to address the work of auditors in relation to going concern. Management needs to evaluate whether it has adequate processes and internal controls in place to comply with the going concern evaluation requirements.

1. Once these factors have been identified, candidates should then be able to think about the procedures the auditor may adopt to establish whether the factors mean the going concern basis of accounting is appropriate in the circumstances, or not.
2. Even if the business’s financials aren’t audited, an accountant who has concerns about the business’s viability should disclose those concerns to the business owner.
3. There are situations that may arise when the auditor may request management to make an assessment, or extend their original assessment of going concern.
4. Unfortunately, the guidance usually sets a high bar for overcoming substantial doubt.
5. The going concern assessment is inherently complex and judgmental and will be under heightened scrutiny for many companies this year due to COVID-19.
6. Under US GAAP, management’s plans are ignored under Step 1 of the going concern assessment.

It will also state that the auditor’s opinion is not modified in respect of this matter. Candidates attempting AA will need to have a sound understanding of the concept of going concern. Among other syllabus requirements, candidates must ensure they are aware of the respective responsibilities of auditors and management regarding going concern. The provisions in ISA 570, Going Concern deal with the auditor’s responsibilities in relation to management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial statements.

Established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), GAAP is a set of standardized accounting rules, requirements, and practices to guide how financial statements are prepared and presented. Any entity (i.e., for-profit companies, non-profits, and government entities) that publicly releases financial statements is required https://intuit-payroll.org/ to adhere to the GAAP principles and procedures. Climate-related risks may result in material uncertainties affecting a company’s ability to continue as a going concern or may involve significant judgements in concluding that there is no material uncertainty. IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements requires disclosure of those uncertainties and significant judgements involved.

Management’s going concern assessment may be significantly affected by the current economic environment. For example, a company may have a profitable track record or prior success at refinancing. However, market conditions have changed as a result of COVID-19 – e.g. financing may be significantly more difficult and more costly to obtain now. Because the US GAAP guidance is more developed in this area, it may provide certain useful reference points for IFRS Standards preparers – e.g. to identify adverse conditions and events or to assess the mitigating effects of management’s plans.

Conditions that lead to substantial doubt about a going concern include negative trends in operating results, continuous losses from one period to the next, loan defaults, lawsuits against a company, and denial of credit by suppliers. An adverse opinion states that the financial statements do not present fairly (or give a true and fair view). This opinion will be expressed regardless of whether or not the financial statements include disclosure of the inappropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting. An entity prepares financial statements on a going concern basis when, under the going concern assumption, the entity is viewed as continuing in business for the foreseeable future.

FASB Issues New Accounting Standard for Certain Crypto Assets

It’s given when the auditor has doubts about the company and the assumption that it is a going concern. A qualified opinion can be a concern to investors, lenders and other stakeholders. BDO USA, P.C., a Virginia professional corporation, is the U.S. member of BDO International Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, and forms part of the international BDO network of independent member firms. © 2024 KPMG LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG global organization of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Limited, a private English company limited by guarantee.

Although US GAAP is more prescriptive than IFRS Standards, we do not expect significant differences in the types of events or conditions management would consider when assessing going concern under both GAAPs. If there is an issue, the audit firm must qualify its audit report with a statement about the problem. In other words, what happened in the past isn’t enough to assume it will happen in the foreseeable future. Using our debt waiver example again, this dynamic is even more important during uncertain economic times or when credit markets have declined.

Report contents

The going concern principle centers around the presumption your business will continue its operations and meet its financial obligations over the next 12 months. Obviously, this assurance is important to many people and parties, so taking management’s word that everything is hunky-dory simply isn’t good enough. Therefore, when serving business clients, it is important that accounting professionals have the right framework to ensure that proper financial reporting procedures are in place to help with accounting assumptions. Most troubling is that auditors might fail to issue a negative going concern opinion because of the lack of auditor independence.

Tax and accounting regions

A firm’s inability to meet its obligations without substantial restructuring or selling of assets may also indicate it is not a going concern. If a company acquires assets during a time of restructuring, it may plan to resell them later. Consider how a single substantial lawsuit, default on a loan, or defective product can jeopardize the future of a company. Most Wealth Management Practices Are UnsuccessfulIn a survey of 328 senior partners at accounting firms with 10 or fewer partners with wealth management practices, 55.2% reported these practices were unsuccessful. This means their wealth management practices did not meet the firm’s expectations, not that they did not help them serve clients better or make money. These senior partners are responsible for their firm’s wealth management efforts.

Helping clients meet their business challenges begins with an in-depth understanding of the industries in which they work. In fact, KPMG LLP was the first of the Big Four firms to organize itself along the same industry lines as clients. If the accountant believes that an entity may no longer be a going concern, then this what is impairment brings up the issue of whether its assets are impaired, which may call for the write-down of their carrying amount to their liquidation value. This is especially important for forecasts management uses in the assessment, where a company must design and implement controls appropriately and use complete and accurate data.

The company’s auditor is the employee who must determine whether or not the company is still a going concern and they report their findings to the Board of Directors. The auditor is required to disclose any negative trends in the company’s business operations. Negative trends include such things as lower operating income, loan denials, loan defaults, repossession of assets, and more. Once this is done, the auditor must issue a “going concern opinion” which means that the entity has neither the intention (nor the need) to liquidate or curtail in any material way the scale of its operations.

Thus, the value of an entity that is assumed to be a going concern is higher than its breakup value, since a going concern can potentially continue to earn profits. PwC refers to the US member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and may sometimes refer to the PwC network. This content is for general information purposes only, and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors. The going concern approach utilizes the standard intrinsic and relative valuation approaches, with the shared assumption that the company (or companies) will be operating perpetually. In the absence of the going concern assumption, companies would be required to recognize asset values under the implicit assumption of impending liquidation. Under the going concern principle, the company is assumed to sustain operations, so the value of its assets (and capacity for value-creation) is expected to endure into the future.

Continuation of an entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for financial reporting unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements are prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting (Financial Accounting Standards Board, 2014[1]). The assumptions used in the going concern assessment should be consistent with those used in other areas of the company’s financial statements, for example impairment of assets, liquidity risk disclosures, etc.

These materials were downloaded from PwC’s Viewpoint (viewpoint.pwc.com) under license. The going concern assumption – i.e. the company will remain in existence indefinitely – comes with broad implications on corporate valuation, as one might reasonably expect. In effect, equity shareholders and other relevant parties can then make well-informed decisions on the best course of action to take with all material information on hand. Management’s assessment of going concern is in the spotlight because of COVID-19 and uncertainties involved. This content outlines initial considerations meriting further consultation with life sciences organizations, healthcare organizations, clinicians, and legal advisors to explore feasibility and risks. For the most part, when you stay on top of maintenance – maybe spring for a new water pump/ERP every so often – and you’re right as rain.

Like it or not, even the best of intentions have nothing to do with the effectiveness of a mitigation plan. Instead, the guidance focuses exclusively on impact and a plan’s ability to address any substantial doubt raised. Therefore, management must include obligations that will arise over the next 12 months, even when they might not be reflected on the current balance sheet. Since liquidity needs over the next 12 months play such a pivotal role in the going concern assessment, management usually doesn’t have to proceed past this financial condition category when there’s sufficient credit to cover all liquidity needs. So what are the different conditions and events management should keep in mind when assessing for going concern? First and foremost, it’s important to remember management is basing the assessment on the conditions and events relevant, known, and reasonably knowable.